When is a
democracy not a democracy? When it's in Briton!
If
you ask any politician, they will tell you that Great Briton is a
democracy. They are how ever incorrect and I feel it's very
important for the average person in Briton to understand why the
politicians are wrong and why we are not living in a democratic
country.
Democracy
is power coming from the people and this is the one thing that will
bring hardened politicians awake in the middle of the night
screaming.
Well
what exactly is democracy?
The term originates
from the Greek δημοκρατία (dēmokratía) "power from
the people", which was found from δῆμος (dêmos) "people"
and κράτος (krátos) "power"
Democracy by definition means the government by people. That
means that all the people should be able to have their say in one way
or another in everything that affects their lives. Dictionaries
usually say that this right can either be exercised directly (by all
members of a community having the possibility to enter personally,
without mediators, their position on a particular issue into the
decision making process - modern technology is able to provide this
possibility for increasingly larger and larger communities), or
through representatives (members of legislative bodies). This second
arrangement is then called Representative Democracy.
Representative democracy would be fine if the representatives
would really make all their decisions only after consulting their
constituencies. In the least, after having a clear idea about the
views of their constituents on a particular issue, and trying to
accommodate these views as best as possible (or postpone the
decisions until an overwhelming majority of the constituents would be
happy with them).
Unfortunately, a vast majority of countries that call
themselves Representative Democracies are not true democracies
according to the above definition. Most of them are actually just
Elected Dictatorships. People can vote usually only once every four
or five years. They do not vote on any issues. They just elect their
so called representatives who then until the next elections have no
obligations by law and little incentives to base their decisions on
individual issues on the wishes on their electorate. They hardly ever
bother to consult them on their stands on various issues. Therefore,
legislative bodies composed of such "representatives" act
in a very dictatorial manner between the elections.
Democracy
is where the average person gets to have a say in how the country is
run, and the country is run to benefit the population as a whole
rather than a small proportion of voters, the politicians and the
party's they are in and a select elite. As a practical exercise, try
writing to your politician asking them to represent you and your
views or concerns in parliament (which is their job after all) in a
matter that goes against their party's policy. They will do nothing,
if you are lucky you'll get a generic reply, which begs the question,
who is your MP really serving, their constituents who voted them in
or their party? MP have to tow the line as they say which means it's
the party's interests first and their constituents/country a poor
second!
It's
about now that the politicians would be jumping up and down and
shouting “but we give you a vote in the elections! That's
democracy right there!” The elections are however anything but
democratic. Briton uses a voting system called First Past The Post,
FPTP. This voting system benefits the two major party's as they only
need to collect a small percentage of the overall votes in order to
get into power. Small party's that can't put a candidate in every
constituency don't stand a chance and yet over all may pull in a
greater number of votes. In many areas voters want to support their
chosen party but can't, and are then faced with ether not voting or
worse voting for a party they don't believe in.
Every government since the 1950s has taken power based on less
than 50% of the popular vote. None has won majority public support at
the ballot box. In the 2005 election, Labour won 35% of the vote but
bagged 55% of the seats. Of eligible voters, only 22% voted Labour.
Yet with the support of only one-fifth of the electorate Labour won a
66-seat majority. This is not democracy. It echoes the
gerrymandering
i
and ballot-rigging of two centuries ago, which galvanised the
Chartists to campaign for a democratic, representative parliament.
The electoral process is "rigged". In 2005, if you total
all the votes cast for the main parties, it took an average 26,906
votes to elect a Labour MP, 44,373 to elect a Tory MP and 96,539
votes to elect a Lib Dem MP. Not since the rotten boroughs of the
18th century have elections been so corrupt. This democratic deficit
is a direct result of the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system, which
allows the election of MPs and governments with minority support.
FPTP enabled Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair to win landslide
majorities based on popular votes of only 35% to 44%. FPTP has
resulted not in ‘strong, stable government’, but in bad,
divisive, unpopular, unrepresentative government, set against the
backdrop of an angry, anti-political, even apolitical, climate, in
which the will of the majority is ignored, and anyone left of centre
has no major party to vote for.
So what should we do? We as in the electorate. We need to take
power back from the undemocratic party's by forcing them to adopt a
voting system that works for us and not just for the two big party's.
Politicians need to represent us, not just their own best interests.
I think that proportional representation is one of the better
options open to us.
Proportional Representation. An electoral system in which parties
gain seats in proportion to the number of votes cast for them.
Proportional systems protect against bad, unrepresentative public
policy, and ensure that the wishes of all voters – not just those
in marginal constituencies – are taken into account.
iIn
the process of setting electoral districts, gerrymandering is a
practice intended to establish a political advantage for a
particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries. The
resulting district is known as a gerrymander, however, that word
can also refer to the process. The term gerrymandering has negative
connotations.